Mtc 45 Lorax 15 Project X {nm} on Feb 28, 08:16
Mtc 45 Lorax 15 Project X. Tagging [LORAX] [PROJX] {nm} on Feb 28, 08:29
RS mid 50s vs. 45... uh-oh. {nm} on Feb 28, 08:59
Have we had a downward MTC vs RS thingy yet this year? Or have they all been uppers? {nm} on Feb 28, 09:05
Several. GDEED just this past weekend, for example. (25 RS, 18 MTC, 16 OW) {nm} on Feb 28, 09:12
(There was also 1MONY - rule didn't work, MYSTR - rule was way off, and WLUST - rule worked, but may have been due to an RS typo) {nm} on Feb 28, 09:17
Isn't it supposed to be a bigger difference? or does the rule "predict" direction? {nm} on Feb 28, 09:18
By difference, I mean the actual OW being much higher or much lower than MTC? {nm} on Feb 28, 09:18
The rule is: if MTC is significantly greater than RS, the OW will be greater than MTC. Similarly, if MTC is significantly less than RS, the on Feb 28, 09:23
And all this says is that RS is made up of crackhead analysts who can't even read their own research. on Feb 28, 09:24
No one's saying to follow the rule blindly. It's just another tool to use (and it gives us something to talk about on a slow day) {nm} on Feb 28, 09:27
Yeah, I can't imagine it being much lower than that. That freaking Lorax is everywhere right now. {nm} on Feb 28, 09:36
So the end result delta from MTC to OW is not looked at when dealing with the rule? Just the fact that the OW is either lower or higher on Feb 28, 09:28
That's my understanding. {nm} on Feb 28, 09:40
WLUST as well (RS: 18, MTC: 8, OW: 6.5); but I don't know the difference is big enough here, only 18% {nm} on Feb 28, 09:17
I thought RS was low teens (i.e. 13)... wasn't that big a gap between them. {nm} on Feb 28, 09:29
Even if it's low-teen, the percentage is big enough for the "rule" to be validated {nm} on Feb 28, 10:26
Thanks {nm} on Feb 28, 08:41
Man... I was hoping it was going to say 60. :) {nm} on Feb 28, 09:15
+1 {nm} on Feb 28, 09:51
Lorax does 52 for the weekend {nm} on Feb 28, 14:36