RotoHockey, I don't want to sound rude, but do we really need all these IPO needed posts? on Jun 03, 20:51
+1 {nm} on Jun 03, 20:56
-1 on Jun 03, 21:46
Good points. on Jun 03, 21:50
Is there any evidence that Antibody pays any attention and creates IPOs based on these posts? on Jun 03, 22:14
Well when I post things about new movies that aren't listed here I just post the source name and then headline, I don't say "IPO Needed". on Jun 03, 22:22
Yeah pretty much :) {nm} on Jun 03, 22:34
Fair enough. Easy solved. :) {nm} on Jun 03, 22:41
-1. Easy enough to ignore them if you don't like them. RotoHockey is an enthusiastic researcher. on Jun 03, 22:26
*ahem* I've only been playing since 2010. Don't know where you got that old players vs newer idea from! on Jun 03, 22:34
If it's not from you, you have nothing to defend, right? on Jun 03, 22:48
Don't leave the boards, Ryan. I enjoy hearing your view on things. {nm} on Jun 03, 22:56
I'll have a league invite sent to you, A_4_J. on Jun 03, 22:59
I'm flattered to be accused of diplomacy :) on Jun 03, 23:29
It's not the effort that's in question, it's the substance. If he's such an enthusiastic researcher, then why all the iPod requests for dtv on Jun 03, 22:46
I haven't paid attention to his posts as I am not 100% active. But, when I was posting every bit of news I could, I put up a ton of ipo on Jun 04, 01:09
I think it's different if there's a release date ... that's useful. {nm} on Jun 04, 02:12
good point. wonder how many "IPO needed" movies actually ger released e.g. Gingerclown 3D {nm} on Jun 04, 03:36
They are a waste of space as currently constituted, but I've already ranted on this subject. {nm} on Jun 04, 05:08
I like them myself. on Jun 04, 05:55
It helps some of us to recognize it is news about a film that doesn't have a stock yet. It is still news. {nm} on Jun 04, 06:44