HOLLYWOOD STOCK EXCHANGE
THE ENTERTAINMENT MARKET
THE ENTERTAINMENT MARKET
I won't cut them any more slack. Sorry. I don't know how much time they spent developing the new site, but clearly it wasn't enough. I don't
care that they changed it or that they make improvements. But test your code first. And implement thing when they work. The surest way to piss off your users is to make "improvements" that make using the site more difficult. Then, instead of fixing the stuff that is broken, implement more new broken features. Makes no sense to me.
When do you think you will stop being patient? You are obviously more patient than I am. Good for you. Will you be saying the same thing a year from now if things don't improve? I'm not saying it won't improve, but come on, at some point it gets ridiculous.
But if you think I am complaining, stop reading my posts. I don't care. I still think that giving us something similar to the old trader box would work great for most people. All we need for trading is to have a box that will pre-populate on a mouseover and let us make a trade. If they are going to pre-populate it in the future, just do it. It is not difficult. No, they fave to make it detachable and fancy and not what people are asking for. Maybe next it will be able to cook my dinner. That would help me more than moving it around my screen.
I like the detachable trading box. Could you make it to where the symbol populatesthe box when you hover over it {nm} Oct 08, 18:17
Yes {nm} Oct 09, 10:03
Yes we plan to add that very soon {nm} Oct 09, 10:05
Thanks for listening to us and keeping us in the loop. {nm} Oct 09, 18:50
OK...so quit complaining and be glad they are listening...maybe they can't get to EVERY suggestion made as soon as it's made?? Oct 10, 08:20
Sorry, this should go UP one more post under "Are you guys nuts?" {nm} Oct 10, 08:22
Well....let's just say that we have no idea what's really going on behind the scenes there...so Oct 11, 11:33
I won't cut them any more slack. Sorry. I don't know how much time they spent developing the new site, but clearly it wasn't enough. I don't Oct 11, 11:51