** This post has been removed by the forum moderator! ** May 02, 18:08
these are the best kinds of newses :) {nm} May 02, 18:34
You know it! {nm} May 02, 18:37
wish id' caught it .75 earlier {nm} May 02, 18:40
Assuming this is the same POMPE on the exchange... {nm} May 02, 18:40
lol {nm} May 02, 18:41
yeah, at this point, even if it's not, it's still all good :) {nm} May 02, 18:43
Why wouldn't it? No distributer listed. Generic description. {nm} May 02, 18:48
The stories are not the same. But in such cases, would perhaps the new film come in the place of the old one, using the same ticker and May 02, 18:50
no {nm} May 02, 18:51
SPID4 and SUPR2 come to mind. But, those were sequels made into remakes. Not sure how this would work. {nm} May 02, 18:52
a seperate moviestock will be IPOed for the new project {nm} May 02, 18:53
you are correct... they are two different projects May 02, 18:49
...and looking at the main plot points of both, it might not be the same ... can anyone confirm/deny? {nm} May 02, 18:46
I think D. Mac should just use it cause it's currently a concept stock waiting for delist anyway {nm} May 02, 18:49
it's probably a question of whether the new one has any conenction to Thomas Harris's story {nm} May 02, 18:52
Same source material though, which does not appear to be the case here. {nm} May 02, 18:53
they are two different projects {nm} May 02, 18:50
now will it drop as fast as it rose?? lol {nm} May 02, 18:54
But since the Robert Harris novel is no longer happening, there's no reason not to use this one for the PANDE movie. May 02, 19:05
the Harris project is becoming a miniseries and will cash out as STC; a new moviestock will be IPOed for this new project {nm} May 02, 19:09
Tell us how you really feel about those resetters SS. lol May 02, 19:09
It's also because of the dynamics of the exchange. And those "evil Twins". (Or, maybe not - I don't know :-)) {nm} May 02, 19:40
I take it back. There are better types of newses. {nm} May 02, 18:55
You know it! {nm} May 02, 18:56
You can use this both ways. Ride it back down. LOL {nm} May 02, 19:00
or it could down a few cents and go back up.... wtf {nm} May 02, 19:12
The stock is now in play.. It's a celebrity stock. It's in the spotlight. Welcome to the mysterious world of HSX. May 02, 19:28
yeah im all confused right now... I don't understand why {nm} May 02, 19:30
(I think he would :)) {nm} May 02, 19:57
yeah but if a movie's not getting made why would you want to buy it? {nm} May 02, 19:58
simply because you think it's going to go up more before it goes down? May 02, 20:02
haha yeah people not checking the boards. {nm} May 02, 20:09
word {nm} May 02, 20:10
it's like when STV stocks are bing bought and going up in price. May 02, 20:14
Sorry just Polanski was supposed to do the movie. Ridley Scott is supposed to be producing miniseries {nm} May 02, 18:59
And it was supposed to become the most expensive European movie production ever. Then came the 2007 strike. {nm} May 02, 19:01
yep {nm} May 02, 19:04
Ridley Scott producing a 4 hr miniseries based on the Robert Harris Book May 02, 18:58