HOLLYWOOD STOCK EXCHANGE
THE ENTERTAINMENT MARKET
THE ENTERTAINMENT MARKET
Discuss, not argue.
If one goes to a detail page for a StarBond, or a MovieStock, the trail of tagged items is there to show changes. Tagging attachments is a good thing. On the MovieStock page, it is a reminder that this was a change to be reckoned with. On the StarBond page, it is a chance to get caught up.
Not everyone reads the original news on the Forum, so if they happen to get to the detail page, HSX news is just as important as the trade papers.
Logically, Mr Spock, if it is news that so and so is attached, it is just as much news that they were detached. If Congress passes a law it is news. If they fail to pass legislation, it is still news.
You have to admit, that when you make an announcent, such as release date changes, and there is the list of tags on the page, that it is very helpful to all that you can click, check on things, go back, click on the next go back.
Finally, I was not picking on the PABS, and at times I have used the list of TAGS to go back and forth. It is also relevant,, at times, to be able to link back to see what the next adjust was at a given time. Tuesdays are hectic. Shortcuts to get to detail pages (ie the Calendar) are always welcome.
To summarize: I think that most in the community would agree that it is useful news to tag all announcements of attachments and detachments.
mrbinns out.
Tagging is for news, not for ease of clicking. I do agree tagging Post-Adjust Bond Show is excessive. {nm} Jun 20, 13:16
Being removed from a movie that is being released in 2 weeks in news {nm} Jun 20, 18:45
Maybe, it's arguable. I think of it as an admin issue. {nm} Jun 21, 10:29
Discuss, not argue. Jun 22, 12:14
