HOLLYWOOD STOCK EXCHANGE
THE ENTERTAINMENT MARKET
THE ENTERTAINMENT MARKET
(iamnotdmacbut) My 2cnts: Replacing a dollar stock with one that would be at $317 is nothing but a money grab, eliminating the challenge of
bond play and port growing. Just imho, JHURT wasnt the star of INDI4 anyways and doesnt deserve the 250M to his cap. Maybe if you want the cap eliminated, also make it harder for secondary actors to get credit, so these non-stars dont have these wild price swings when they get cast in 1 hit flick.
(Side note, I really like JHURT so its not a bash on him, just bonds in general)
Official Adjusts Jan 05, 10:50
JHURT is an example why the $250M limit is needed. {nm} Jan 05, 11:12
Could you explain further as to why the $250 cap is needed? {nm} Jan 05, 11:57
(iamnotdmacbut) My 2cnts: Replacing a dollar stock with one that would be at $317 is nothing but a money grab, eliminating the challenge of Jan 06, 07:00
The solution to excess cash is finding a way to remove excess cash, not to create even more excess cash. {nm} Jan 06, 14:13
I don't understand. {nm} Jan 09, 16:37