CelebStock and StarBonds

TAG Cap Wit Jun 06, 12:13

The point of the cap is to keep the price shift to a max of H$50. Too much easy money already. Antibody Jun 06, 17:31

That's okay because any "easy money" we make on bonds, we lose on HSX's awful stock IPOs {nm} diamondman56 Jun 07, 04:39

is the 1 stock you own a starbond? {nm} RazorHawk Jun 07, 06:01

I generally make easy money shorting IPO's {nm} JohnTEQP Jun 13, 22:07

So, a max price shift of h$60 instead of H$50 is way too much? {nm} Wit Jun 07, 07:46

Yes, they add up. {nm} Antibody Jun 07, 09:24

FWIW...times 20,000 shares, that's an easy $1.2M in 4 weeks...times 5-6 blockbusters...times how ever many traders {nm} tealfan Jun 07, 09:26

Actually, it's only a difference of H$200K from the current Tag Cap, not 1.2M, Wit Jun 07, 12:44

Increasing the CAP will actually Sleprock Jun 07, 05:18

The bigger the wave, the bigger the profit. Stars that appear in $500M movies aren't really the reason they make $500M Antibody Jun 07, 09:22

...and stars that appear in small indie films aren't the reason they don't make $500M. Sleprock Jun 07, 09:37

I don't understand your response. The indie film gross is closer to their true star bankability value. Giving them more box office Antibody Jun 07, 10:13

Yes, I agreeJust agreeing that there are a lot of factors- even the hottest BO draws often have Sleprock Jun 07, 12:12

It makes the gains easier for big portfolios with more cash than they know what to do with. For them, it's a matter of buying and waiting. {nm} RogerMore Jun 07, 13:07