TVStocks, MusicStocks and Life

petulant moron becomes first sitting POTUS to threaten to preemptively start nuclear war slipping jimmy Aug 08, 22:03

It's always better to let the other country fire all of their nuclear weapons first. {nm} TJNFL1 Aug 09, 10:05

So U.S. should fire its nukes first? Wut? {nm} Antibody Aug 09, 11:00

As with most all TJNFL's troll posts, he's all talk and no plan. Pretty much sums up Trump, so they have that in common. {nm} BSmurf Aug 09, 11:10

no, it's better to let the other country fire their nuclear weapons first. {nm} TJNFL1 Aug 09, 11:25

Japan would disagree. No, it's better to not let any country fire their nukes. {nm} Antibody Aug 09, 11:28

Tell Kim Jong Un. I'm sure he will listen to you, and comply. {nm} TJNFL1 Aug 09, 11:36

He's not shooting his nukes. {nm} Antibody Aug 09, 11:37

North Korea is threatening to nuke Guam - about 6,000 US troops currently in Guam TJNFL1 Aug 09, 11:47

Umm, that's AFTER Trump threatened North Korea with "fire and fury" unlike the world had ever seen {nm} Antibody Aug 09, 11:55

so, let the other country fire their nukes first {nm} TJNFL1 Aug 09, 11:59

the first thing Jong Un will do if attacked is destroy Seoul. There was a war between N Korea and S Korea in the 50's and Moviesnob Aug 09, 12:04

If North Korea fires nukes at Seoul first, Seoul is destroyed {nm} TJNFL1 Aug 09, 12:16

These aren't nukes. Its conventional artillery thats been there for decades. This is not a new situation. {nm} Moviesnob Aug 09, 12:21

You will now reply to this post because you can't help it. {nm} DTravel Aug 09, 12:47

and it will be some variant of "it's better to let the other country fire their nuclear weapons first" w/o understanding what that rly means {nm} BSmurf Aug 09, 12:57

sorry guys, had to run some errands TJNFL1 Aug 09, 20:50

He just wants attention.Trump should ignore him like past Presidents. But Trump wants attention too so he's going to keep this going unril s {nm} JDolphin Aug 09, 17:49

someone does something stupid and we're in a war because both of these people are crazy and need to have the last word (or worse) {nm} JDolphin Aug 09, 17:52

Other president's havent ignored N Korea its just a bad and complex situation. Obama added US sanctions to UN sanctions on N Korea last year Moviesnob Aug 09, 19:04

Ignoring North Korea by past presidents got us into this mess. Doing the same thing and expecting different results is......{nm} TJNFL1 Aug 09, 20:58

I'm happy with past results - i.e. North Korea has done nothing. But if Trump keeps up the back and forth something is going to happen JDolphin Aug 09, 22:02

Happy with past results? They have acquired nuclear weapons over that time period. Negotiations were supposed to prevent that. {nm} TJNFL1 Aug 09, 22:34

Still better than the strategy of letting the other country fire their nukes first and destroy Guam/Hawaii/California. {nm} Antibody Aug 10, 11:56

So, preemptive military actions? {nm} TJNFL1 Aug 10, 20:50

Restart the Korean War and kill millions in Seoul? {nm} Antibody Aug 11, 09:42

Seoul is not militarily defendable, unless US strikes first and gets everything on the first try and that's not likely. TJNFL1 Aug 11, 22:35