HOLLYWOOD STOCK EXCHANGE
THE ENTERTAINMENT MARKET
THE ENTERTAINMENT MARKET
Hopefully, more like five or less.
Rachel McAdams was in everything a few years ago. Stone is the new her. McAdams has that Woody Allen film that's a hit but she isn't the reason as Woody himself is the reason. Plus, Morning Glory was a flop and she had nothing to do with the success of Sherlock Holmes. She isnt' even in the upcoming sequel. Stone will flame out too.
I pointed this out on Twitter, but Emma Stone has now appeared in four movies that have been hugely profitable Aug 21, 16:58
She's not the reason any of those outside of Easy A were successful. {nm} Aug 21, 17:00
Did I say otherwise? She was in the movies, they were successful. {nm} Aug 21, 17:59
"Easy A" may not be as profitable as many people thought; Screen Gems spent $35 million to market "Easy A" theatrically {nm} Aug 21, 17:02
More excatly; Screen Gems spent $35 million to market "Easy A" in US theatrically {nm} Aug 21, 17:03
sorry for typo... Screen Gems spent $35 million to market "Easy A" in United States AND Canada theatrically {nm} Aug 21, 17:05
People didn't even know who she was when Superbad came out. {nm} Aug 21, 17:07
And Zombieland was all about Woody {nm} Aug 21, 17:08
10 years from now you'll say Emma WHO? {nm} Aug 21, 17:15
Hopefully, more like five or less. Aug 21, 17:21
Overexposure isn't a good thing. People will get sick of her. They always do. {nm} Aug 21, 17:53