HOLLYWOOD STOCK EXCHANGE
THE ENTERTAINMENT MARKET
THE ENTERTAINMENT MARKET
I agree and I think you've been fair.
Since the removal of adjusts I've been checking in less over the weekend and in general. Then again I've only been playing for 1.5 years and I might just be getting fatigue getting to my first H$1B.
It has removed some of the urgency and fun out of normal play for me though.
I feel Antibody has a tough job managing the system and community whilst having to implement changes dictated from above. I think what has been taken with one hand has been partially given back with the other hand in terms of IPO and option pricing, but that only covers the H$ not how fun the game is.
What he said about the 2.7 multiplier hobbling the data makes sense though. I would love to see halt/adjusts brought back in whatever form - different multipliers for genres seems sensible, as would the multipliers changing more often.
Yeah, I'm really hating the new game without having halt/adjusts... Mar 05, 04:56
I agree. I've been finding it difficult to find my new rhythm with the change so I don't play as much now. {nm} Mar 05, 05:25
I agree and I think you've been fair. Mar 05, 05:29
+1 {nm} Mar 05, 05:41
Yeah, it's like what I said a couple weeks ago that there will be a lot more ARB stocks after openings Mar 05, 05:55
Then again, John Wick 2 is going to delist just above 2.7 so maybe that's still an apt mult to use. {nm} Mar 05, 06:39
this is the part I don't like -- taking a temporary-but-hard hit on films with good OWs and the promise of legs {nm} Mar 05, 10:45
But, HSX is not a real market, it is (was) a game. The adjust was the fun. {nm} Mar 05, 06:37
+1 {nm} Mar 05, 13:29
Totally agree. I barely play anymore and it is extremely difficult to make money. {nm} Mar 05, 06:10
I guess I just like it when there's more of a challenge to make the fake money. That's what makes it fun as a game. {nm} Mar 05, 06:40
it's not a challange, its simply a choice of spending the time to stay up & log on to this stupid site at reset {nm} Mar 05, 18:17
Can't make money if there are no players {nm} Mar 05, 07:44
Agree. LOGAN would be adjusting at $230.31 and instead sits $50 lower. It was fun to get paid for getting the OW.... Mar 05, 08:14
It was a challenging and fun. Reading forums, doing research, waiting for early estimates... Mar 05, 08:21
The "game" has definitely lost the pizazz it once had. I don't visit as often since the loss of the halts and adjusts. Mar 05, 09:03
I like it, but would double the shares allowed for OW {nm} Mar 05, 09:58
I guess I can no longer say that not a single player asked for or likes the change. Mar 05, 10:01
That makes sense. {nm} Mar 05, 12:15
I proposed 250k when we had the switch to approximate the same total dollar outlay, but yes, 100k is not enough {nm} Mar 05, 10:14
I don't -hate- it, I suppose, but it's made me really apathetic. I log in less frequently and care less when I see red. {nm} Mar 06, 05:23
