HOLLYWOOD STOCK EXCHANGE
THE ENTERTAINMENT MARKET
THE ENTERTAINMENT MARKET
It depends on whether the actor is credited in the movie. GSHAN was credited in IRNM2 but not in CAPA2.
I understand that this seems arbitrary, but look at it from this perspective:
Starbond values are supposed to represent the average gross of the star's movies.
HSX determines what movies go into a star's TAG using objective criteria - a credit in the movie's main credits/publicity materials. This is easy to verify, easy for traders to verify and can be done without going to see every movie that has a moviestock.
The producers decide whether to include an actor in the main credits (or not). They're not thinking about HSX when they do this. They're thinking about publicity, their working relationship with the actor, etc.
This can lead to outcomes on HSX that seem arbitrary, like GSHAN. But the arbitrariness comes from producers deciding which names to credit, which we have no control over. So, accept it and move on.
I'm still trying to figure out how this star bond attachment thing works... Jun 03, 06:16
It depends on whether the actor is credited in the movie. GSHAN was credited in IRNM2 but not in CAPA2. Jun 03, 06:49
Yeah.. Guess I was thinking since it was a recurring character.. Thansk {nm} Jun 03, 07:12
