HSX Forum

TVStocks, MusicStocks and Life

Reply Topic List All Forums

A deserved end to a magnet for illegal immigration based on an unconstitutional executive order by President Obama.

Posted by: TJNFL1 on Sep 05, 17:28 in response to Antibody's post Trump's Stunning Hypocrisy on DACA. contradict his...

DACA has allowed some 800,000 people who came to the U.S. illegally to stay. There is no law that allows them to stay. There was only President Obama stating that he would not prosecute and deport. Obama claimed that DACA was a temporary fix and that congress would have to address it sooner or later. So here we are, congress is addressing it. Obama did not say it was amnesty. He did not say it was a path to citizenship. He said it was a temporary fix.

A number of states, threatened to challenge DACA in court unless Trump rescinds it by this week. President Obama exceeded the authority delegated to him by Congress by implementing DACA. Ending DACA is about "strengthening the constitutional order and the rule of law in America."

If any promises are being broken, they are promises made by a former President who has no authority to see those promises through. Basically Obama lied to those 800,000 people by stating that they were home free, or the illegal's misunderstood what he said to mean the same. Either way, there is no legal reason for them to be here, so maybe getting in line and filling out some paperwork like everyone else might help.

http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2017/09/daca_was_a_bad_dream.html

POTUS ends DACA (in Jan: "I do have a big heart. We’re going to take care of everybody...we’re looking at it with great heart.") slipping jimmy Sep 05, 10:57

Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals is being deferred to congress, ... the people who make the laws. TJNFL1 Sep 05, 11:22

Yet, Trump banned Muslims from several countries "like some kind of monarch or dictator." {nm} Antibody Sep 05, 13:42

You mean the restrictions from countries without domestic vetting systems? That national security threat? When did that go into law? {nm} TJNFL1 Sep 05, 13:53

It took effect in June. {nm} Antibody Sep 05, 14:01

The watered down version so restricted that it's basically meaningless? {nm} TJNFL1 Sep 05, 17:31

Do you always pose a rhetorical question on a non-sequitur when you're wrong? {nm} Antibody Sep 06, 10:30

Yes. Dozens of example on this board alone. Main reason I don't engage with him anymore. Incapable of discussion {nm} BSmurf Sep 06, 10:34

Questions promote thought {nm} TJNFL1 Sep 06, 20:26

Discourse promotes thought. Your nonsense and non-sequiturs promote your troll status and are just attempts by you to evade. {nm} BSmurf Sep 07, 09:10

Your teachers never asked you a question in school?....see, promotes thought. Hard to have discourse with people who all think alike. {nm} TJNFL1 Sep 07, 16:57