HOLLYWOOD STOCK EXCHANGE
THE ENTERTAINMENT MARKET
THE ENTERTAINMENT MARKET
I disagree
For SCIFI the description mentions movies not MovieStocks, the derivatives are related directly to the performance of the movie and so are covered by the existing mandate.
ASIAN, BIGEZ, DISNX, EURO, SCIFI & SQUEL Need To Add 'Derivatives' To Their Mandates. {nm} Mar 25, 21:57
See AARP, SPOOK, TOLKN, CHOIC, LATIN, IN3D OR AFRAM for 'Derivatives' Wording. {nm} Mar 25, 21:59
I disagree Mar 26, 03:28
Huh? A 'Derivative' is not a 'Movie'. If your Fund wants to invest in Derivatives, it should say so. Mar 26, 05:33
I wasn't aware I was making a big deal out of it - I was just sharing my opinion Mar 26, 06:56
I always thought that buying eligible derivatives was a given. How does a fund change or 'edit' its mandate? {nm} Mar 26, 07:01
Just email Dmac with the revamp. That's what I did for AWARD. {nm} Mar 26, 07:06
Thanks! {nm} Mar 26, 07:38
It is a given. Disregard Roto's "Mandate". {nm} Mar 26, 10:57
It is the HSX MovieFunds' Mandates. Why is there such resistance to correcting obvious errors? {nm} Mar 26, 11:23
This can be resolved quickly & easily by simply adding 'Derivatives' to the mandates of all MovieFunds. {nm} Mar 26, 11:25
This would give them all the legal authority to invest in Derivatives even of they choose not to do so. {nm} Mar 26, 11:26
I buy 'em when I am eligible....if they are worth the droi. {nm} Mar 26, 06:55
