HSX Forum

Movies

I wonder if there's a way to change the person's name to indicate that it's someone else entering MCA's picks. {nm}

Posted by: Ruthian23 on Jan 23, 07:00 in response to second gary's post Thank you Karl, and thank you grammar for looking into...

EAP God Clarification Karl_S Jan 22, 22:37

MCA never joined EAP. They never entered any guesses whatsover. {nm} VictorY Jan 22, 22:51

They have an account and they entered picks. {nm} Karl_S Jan 22, 22:58

I've spoken to Sensei. That account is not them and should be removed. Someone's impersonating them. VictorY Jan 22, 23:05

If they have a problem with it they can use the feedback option. Karl_S Jan 22, 23:11

NO. Remove the account or I'll report it to MCA... Don't make me repeat this... {nm} VictorY Jan 22, 23:12

Take a Valium. Report it to MCA and let them handle it at the site of the game. This isn't the place for it. {nm} Vashta Nerada Jan 22, 23:57

Alright. I'll do that. But let's be clear, I really think we're burning a bridge here. MCA will never do anything EAP after this. VictorY Jan 23, 00:43

You are NOT Sensei right? So you cannot speak for him. {nm} grammar Jan 23, 00:54

No, I'm not Sensei... I already spoke with him once today and he didn't seem happy. We do this and (my opinion) they will never join EAP. {nm} VictorY Jan 23, 00:57

If that's what you want then, like I said, "missed oppurtunity." I don't see this ending well. {nm} VictorY Jan 23, 00:59

If there's an EAP/MCA rumble, can I buy tickets? Will it be in 3D? {nm} Ruthian23 Jan 23, 06:58

Accuracy not being fudged??? Someone intentionally enterting a guess of "0" didn't seem suspicious to you??? VictorY Jan 22, 23:47

You make "Internet threats" and you call somebody else childish. L5 {nm} Vashta Nerada Jan 22, 23:58

Its not a "threat" genius. Here it's much easier to resolve this. We go the feedback route. Sensei and Iron Fist will not be happy. VictorY Jan 23, 00:17

As well as never participate with anything EAP in the future. That would be a missed oppurtunity considering their site's success. {nm} VictorY Jan 23, 00:19

SHUT UP ALREADY! Or at least learn to use, "I" "We" "Us" "You" and "They" properly. {nm} tawdryhepburn Jan 23, 02:25

If it isn't Sensei doing those estimates on EAP God, why do you care about the so-called impostor's accuracy? {nm} accountant_4_Jesus Jan 23, 03:21

He's worried that this will prove how inaccurate mca is. {nm} eyescovered Jan 23, 03:43

Truer words have never been posted. {nm} BionicMoron Jan 23, 05:58

Because the impostor is using MCA's name. Regardless of what you may think of the site, impersonating someone isn't cool. {nm} Roger More Jan 23, 06:06

+ 1. {nm} VictorY Jan 23, 12:58

Thank you Karl, and thank you grammar for looking into this, for your work as always. second gary Jan 23, 06:19

I wonder if there's a way to change the person's name to indicate that it's someone else entering MCA's picks. Ruthian23 Jan 23, 07:00

I don't see the point in blemishing EAP with an electronic trace of an unwilling participant's guesses, even if entered by someone else. second gary Jan 23, 07:05

Point taken, but I also don't think it would necessarily be a bad idea to enter the predictions for outlets like V, THR, BOG, and others to Ruthian23 Jan 23, 07:22

That would be interesting, but it's beyond EAP's job description, I think, and... second gary Jan 23, 08:12

Yeah, I definitely don't want them to burden themselves with an extra duty since they do plenty already. {nm} Ruthian23 Jan 23, 08:27

Yeah, you're probably right that the person wasn't really claiming to be MCA, but just putting in the site's predictions to compare them. Roger More Jan 23, 08:23

Yeah. I guess I was just kind of saying that I didn't quite get the outrage expressed. {nm} Ruthian23 Jan 23, 08:30

There's a lot about MCA I don't quite get. {nm} stevie1der328 Jan 23, 09:00

The outrage was over a zero being entered intentionally on one of the guesses. It intentionally lowerd MCA's accuracy to make them look bad. VictorY Jan 23, 13:01

I think there is another more charitable interpretation. second gary Jan 23, 13:24

You don't know that it was intentional, and given every thing is public it seems unlikely. Plus it only got one person upset. {nm} Roger More Jan 23, 13:25

(I mean, intentionally made to make MCA look bad) {nm} Roger More Jan 23, 13:28

A lot more than one person was upset. It wasn't a fair deal, you'd feel differently if it was done to you... {nm} VictorY Jan 23, 13:47

Not on these boards. {nm} Roger More Jan 23, 13:56

I'm not sure 3 is really "a lot more than one person". BionicMoron Jan 23, 13:59

No one cares. Go away and take mca with you. It's caused nothing but trouble on here. {nm} eyescovered Jan 23, 14:11

I secretly like the drama. I find it entertaining to read. {nm} PRodQuanta Jan 23, 17:15





Post a Reply

To post to the forums you must first login!


Michael (MJACK) 5510 172.04 (+1.96)          Outcome (OUTCM) 1 4.98 (-4.88)          Robert Downey Jr. (RDOWN) 1152 229.81 (-1.98)          Michael (MJACK) 5510 172.04 (+1.96)          A Tree is Blue (ATBLU) 149999 4.53 (+0.32)          A Tree is Blue (ATBLU) 150000 4.53 (+0.32)          Justin Long (JLONG) 25000 37.35 (+0.12)          Avengers: Doomsday (AVNG5) 600 548.34 (+0.13)          Jermaine Fowler (JFOWL) 25000 7.78 (-0.05)          Spider-Man: Brand New Day (SPID9) 300 421.53 (+0.70)          The Devil Wears Prada 2 (PRAD2) 100 176.72 (-0.31)          Rachel McAdams (RMCAD) 25000 89.67 (-0.99)          Jack O'Connell (JAOCO) 25000 68.82 (+1.00)          Billy Crudup (BCRUD) 25000 23.56 (-0.11)          Adam Sandler (ASAND) 25000 98.15 (-0.40)          Emily Mortimer (EMORT) 25000 38.39 (0.00)          Billy Crudup (BCRUD) 25000 23.56 (-0.11)          Adam Sandler (ASAND) 25000 98.15 (-0.40)          The Housekeeper (HSKPR) 150000 4.47 (-0.33)          The Animal Fund (ZOO) 20000 20.34 (+0.25)          Owen Wilson (OWILS) 25000 23.50 (-0.87)          Ink (INK) 1 14.95 (-0.06)          Zoe Saldana (ZSALD) 25000 152.11 (-0.50)          Thandiwe Newton (TNEWT) 25000 98.36 (-0.50)          Tom Bateman (TBATE) 25000 45.88 (+0.16)          Steve Zahn (SZAHN) 25000 15.92 (+0.30)          Paul Rudd (PRUDD) 25000 67.73 (+0.75)          Kate Winslet (KWINS) 25000 98.72 (-0.25)          Jemaine Clement (JCLEM) 25000 145.83 (-0.66)          Jack Black (JBLAC) 25000 158.59 (+1.01)          Gael Garcia Bernal (GGBER) 25000 50.48 (-0.33)          George Clooney (GCLOO) 25000 36.83 (-0.10)          Emily Mortimer (EMORT) 25000 38.39 (0.00)          Cliff Curtis (CCURT) 25000 113.76 (-0.33)          Park Chan-wook (CWPAR) 25000 2.32 (+0.17)          Billy Crudup (BCRUD) 25000 23.56 (-0.11)          Alejandro Monteverde (ALMON) 25000 52.69 (0.00)          Alexandra Daddario (ADADD) 25000 67.17 (+0.30)          Frozen III (FROZ3) 450 313.23 (+1.25)          Stephen Graham (SGRAH) 25000 95.00 (0.00)          Heel (HEEL) 150000 1.00 (0.00)          Hello Kitty (HLOKT) 100 29.38 (0.00)          The Asian Fund (ASIAN) 20000 27.36 (-0.39)          The Animal Fund (ZOO) 20000 20.34 (+0.25)          Michael (MJACK) 5000 172.04 (+1.96)          Evil Dead Burn (EVLD6) 39 39.54 (+1.09)          Outcome (OUTCM) 150000 4.98 (-4.88)          The Super Mario Galaxy Movie (MARI2) 1249 499.60 (+1.28)          Hello Kitty (HLOKT) 1000 29.38 (0.00)          Outcome (OUTCM) 148596 4.98 (-4.88)