Movies

Which is lamer: The rerelease of old movies in "3D" or HSX releasing movie stocks around them? {nm} Broiler Mar 03, 06:37

To be fair, HSX is only releasing those movie stocks because the studios are re-releasing those lame 3D movies {nm} FabioParme Mar 03, 06:39

I say they should ignore them altogether. HSX doesn't recognize the starbonds in the movie so why recognize the movie? {nm} Broiler Mar 03, 06:41

Because ignoring a movie that makes $30 million OW would be stupid. {nm} RogerMore Mar 03, 06:46

How would ignoring movies in the top 5, making 20M+ over a weekend, make any sense for HSX? {nm} BionicMoron Mar 03, 06:47

They ignore films in the top 5 making 20mil + all the time PaulBuxton2011 Mar 03, 06:56

Um, fine. OPENING weekend then. BionicMoron Mar 03, 07:00

fair point, especially the warrants {nm} PaulBuxton2011 Mar 03, 07:11

If by "all the time" you mean 3 times in the last 13 years (and once in the last decade :) RogerMore Mar 03, 10:06

Because HSX wants to be comprehensive and covers all movies released in north US for the benefit of all traders ;) {nm} karspov Mar 03, 06:58

What about B.O. sales in the Confederacy? ;) {nm} Austinmh Mar 03, 07:48

I think it's because HSX sells the data to buyers who want to know how those movies might do. {nm} ryancoke2 Mar 03, 09:01

Which is lamer: owning REAL stock in a studio that DOESN'T decide to make $20M+ by rereleasing a classic in 3D, or only owning HSX stocks? {nm} PRodQuanta Mar 03, 06:58

Feeling of deja vu. Didn't we have this discussion just a few months ago? {nm} DTravel Mar 03, 12:51