HOLLYWOOD STOCK EXCHANGE
THE ENTERTAINMENT MARKET
THE ENTERTAINMENT MARKET
I went to see this movie and they wanted $10.25.
I've never paid that much for a movie.
1. I'm not about to pay $10.25 for A 91 minute movie
2. I'm not a Clooney fan
3. Not an Affleck fan
4. It's not 3 dimensional.
If it had starred Al Pacino and Robert DeNiro I would have paid the ten and a quarter and worn the glasses.
My idea of a 3D scscreen exists for my own theater, of a 7x4x4 screen box with 20 screens 1/8 inch apart. Each screen get a piece of the movie and the movie can be shown in the round.
Get a life H-Wood, you're living in the 50's.
Well deserved. {nm} Oct 04, 17:02
Indeed. After 4.5 years of work... Couldn't happen to a better filmmaker. {nm} Oct 04, 17:24
guess AJOLI or NPORT shoulda taken the role {nm} Oct 04, 17:35
Wouldn't have been as good. Sandra and George truly connected on this one. {nm} Oct 04, 17:57
Neither one of them could have saved that script. {nm} Oct 05, 12:06
I went to see this movie and they wanted $10.25. {nm} Oct 04, 18:18
Here it's $17.50 for UltraAVX 3D {nm} Oct 04, 18:24
I went to see this movie and they wanted $10.25. Oct 04, 18:27
ha ha. try the Cinerama Dome on a weekend {nm} Oct 04, 18:37
Wow, I wish I could find a place that shows 3D movies for $10.50. Where do you live? {nm} Oct 04, 20:19
Was $8.50 here today at the final matinee for 3D :) {nm} Oct 04, 22:47
one of the local theaters $3.25 for 3d 1st matinee even new releases if you bring your own glasses! $5.25 otherwise {nm} Oct 05, 08:31
Jeez. I went to the 10:45am and it was $12. {nm} Oct 05, 17:00
You think $10.25 is too much for a 3D show? That won't even cover a sandwich and cup of coffee where I live. Oct 04, 20:19
Affleck isn't in Gravity. Affleck is in the OTHER opener, Runer Runer. Unless your theater is doing a mashup of the two. {nm} Oct 04, 20:45
