Movies

BORN5 overestimated, BMOMS and NERVE underestimated. jnine13 Aug 01, 12:27

8:13 AM: Still not actuals. {nm} Antibody Aug 01, 12:36

The Numbers has actuals and DL is correct. RollingThunder Aug 01, 12:45

The 1st line in DL article sats "Overnight Estimates" {nm} JDolphin Aug 01, 13:22

Still, we're grasping at straws. The-Numbers provided the final results for BORN5, just a hair under OW for TREK3. {nm} Jay_Beezy Aug 01, 13:31

The may be similar to the actuals but they weren't actuals as posted and should not be reperesented as such {nm} JDolphin Aug 01, 13:32

He actually never said the numbers provided by DL were actuals. Just that the numbers were overestimated. {nm} Jay_Beezy Aug 01, 13:34

Antibody said they weren't actuals which they weren't then RT said DL is correct implying that DL were actuals which they weren't {nm} JDolphin Aug 01, 13:45

You're speaking on my behalf. I didn't imply anything - only just offered The Numbers as a source for actuals. RollingThunder Aug 01, 14:11

The post was 4 hours late and misleading as if the actuals just came out. {nm} Antibody Aug 01, 14:04

YES. I knew BORN5 would slip. Universal just wanted that sweet $60M other franchises weren't and didn't hit this summer--like BORN5. {nm} chosenone2oo5 Aug 01, 12:59

Did the same exact people watch Bourne and Trek? $59.2M actuals for both - what are the odds in back-to-back weekends? {nm} TwoMisfits Aug 01, 13:04

I saw TREK3 and skipped BORN5. Though I wonder what the BORN5 OW would've been if BMOMS had held off a few weeks. {nm} chosenone2oo5 Aug 01, 13:07