HOLLYWOOD STOCK EXCHANGE
THE ENTERTAINMENT MARKET
THE ENTERTAINMENT MARKET
But people bought into SPID4 based on certain information about it's production. Since the new movie is changing a lot of aspects...
It actually seems reasonable to me that there should be a new stock representing the new production.
The original SPID4 that everyone knew about is dead and gone. The new one has a whole new cast of people that will be attached to it.. and perhaps new technology (3D)?
A delist in this case sounds reasonable.
N Finke: Spider-man 4 scrapped Jan 11, 14:18
that's a VERY good question!!! {nm} Jan 11, 14:30
...and it definitely affects how i spend my AVATR earnings!! {nm} Jan 11, 14:32
Not sure. I remember when the Mummy 3 nose-dived and the Scorpion King became a separate stock. {nm} Jan 11, 14:34
Scorpion King was not Mummy 3. This would be the same as BAT5 becoming Batman Begins. {nm} Jan 11, 15:14
who cares about mummy3. answer my question. PLZ RESPOND. {nm} Jan 11, 15:22
"This would be the same as BAT5 becoming Batman Begins. " {nm} Jan 11, 15:24
thank you sir. {nm} Jan 11, 15:32
Either way, TIMBER!! {nm} Jan 11, 14:46
lol. what was that like 14pts in 4minutes? {nm} Jan 11, 14:51
Just wait till delist!!! She's goin' DOWN! {nm} Jan 11, 14:55
"There will be no Spider-Man 4." {nm} Jan 11, 14:32
Ouch.....Just got trampled running for the exit. {nm} Jan 11, 14:37
why couldn't this news be posted AFTER delist?!?!?!? {nm} Jan 11, 14:42
I know right?!?! {nm} Jan 11, 14:45
totally trampled here (geez go away for a couple hours and i lose almost $1M on one piece of news >O {nm} Jan 11, 15:56
Official press release Jan 11, 14:46
youre right. it would be better. {nm} Jan 11, 14:55
watch where avatr money goes {nm} Jan 11, 15:05
Wow, worst case scenario, but for the best. {nm} Jan 11, 15:09
Same stock. See BAT5, TRK11 and JB21. {nm} Jan 11, 15:23
but it's not a sequel to the original now. it's a new Spiderman franchise from scratch {nm} Jan 11, 15:25
What? See BAT5, TRK11 and JB21. {nm} Jan 11, 15:31
great. now i have to watch for this damn thing to bounce. {nm} Jan 11, 15:34
by that logic, BAT5 should actually be BAT9 {nm} Jan 11, 15:40
I still don't understand your point. BAT5 was not delisted and reIPOed when it was rebooted. {nm} Jan 11, 15:46
Sony is saying outright it's not going to be Spiderman 4 anymore. it's essentially a whole new franchise {nm} Jan 11, 15:50
How is it different from the Batman reboot, the Star Trek reboot or the Casino Royale reboot? {nm} Jan 11, 15:54
none of them ever were shut down halfway into production and restarted with an entirely new cast, director, story {nm} Jan 11, 15:57
SPID4 was not in production. {nm} Jan 11, 16:01
dmac, just give us our delist at H$0 so we can make 200+ x 50000shares. {nm} Jan 11, 16:02
yes, please! Jan 11, 16:06
It's the same franchise owned by the same company produced by the same people. {nm} Jan 11, 15:47
That's fine, DMac, but it's simply not part 4. If anything, HSX was wrong on BAT5. In fact, Dark Knight is called BATM2. {nm} Jan 11, 16:07
It's just a ticker symbol that can be easily changed if we choose to. {nm} Jan 11, 16:12
But people bought into SPID4 based on certain information about it's production. Since the new movie is changing a lot of aspects... Jan 11, 16:56
Pretty much everyone knew SPID4 = "the next Spiderman movie" regardless of the details. Jan 11, 17:48
lol, you a quik one aint ya. {nm} Jan 11, 15:23
So what's the answer, smart guy? {nm} Jan 11, 15:28
just read whatever DMAC aka antibody says. {nm} Jan 11, 15:33
Thanks. {nm} Jan 11, 15:38
It's gonna be THE SAME STOCK. Keep it or dump it. It's going to go way down or way up......rollercoaster. {nm} Jan 11, 16:32
Ok, I owe a few people a "you were right, I'm an idiot" so...yeah, you were right, I'm an idiot {nm} Jan 11, 15:28
I should delist so be quick to sell long and short it - nm Jan 11, 16:01