HOLLYWOOD STOCK EXCHANGE
THE ENTERTAINMENT MARKET
THE ENTERTAINMENT MARKET
If there is no collusion, why would he order an investigation? {nm}
Barack Obama, through former NSA Susan Rice ordered Trump surveillance. Apr 03, 16:50
The article doesn't say that. {nm} Apr 03, 16:55
Again, nothing in that quote about Obama ordering surveillance of Trump. Or ordering surveillance of ANYONE. {nm} Apr 03, 17:49
Article states, "electronic surveillance of candidate and President-elect Trump" Apr 03, 18:08
Nothing saying Obama ordered it and the quotes you are posting are saying those names came up while surveilling OTHER people. Apr 03, 20:40
Private citizens are protected under law from public disclosure. Apr 04, 10:02
Infowars is not a credible source. {nm} Apr 04, 10:08
According to former U.S. Attorney Joseph diGenova, and former National Security Council senior director Michael Doran,..... Apr 04, 11:04
NY: Susan Rice and the Latest Bogus Attempt to Justify Trump's Wiretapping Tweet Apr 04, 11:19
"If Susan Rice was abusing this process, (unmasking), she did a terrible job of covering it up." {nm} Apr 04, 11:47
Meaning it's not an abuse of the process since it's right out in the open as a normal part of the protocol. {nm} Apr 04, 11:49
or, she abused the unmasking process, Obama covered with a policy change, and she lied out of fear of prosecution. {nm} Apr 04, 12:02
That's a lot of "if's". More than likely she was just doing her normal job she was hired to do. {nm} Apr 04, 17:21
At least Bill Clinton won't interfere with any more secret airport meetings with Attorney General Loretta Lynch. {nm} Apr 04, 20:54
Surveillance of Russians diplomats is a normal part of Intelligence gathering. The intelligence needed to be saved before Apr 03, 17:43
Where would the federal intelligence information go after Obama? Would it not stay within the various agencies? {nm} Apr 03, 17:53
I have no idea what you're asking. {nm} Apr 03, 17:56
Sorry, responding to your,"intelligence needed to be saved before" statement. Didn't understand the "need" or "before". {nm} Apr 03, 18:11
Simple. Trump isn't going to investigate Russia's meddling into the election. {nm} Apr 03, 20:42
3 FBI probes and 5 Congressional investigations taking place. Apr 03, 21:02
Might imply she violated someone's civil liberties instead. {nm} Apr 04, 13:38
FBI and Congress are not the Trump administration. {nm} Apr 04, 10:03
Your asking Trump to do the job of the President, the FBI, and the Congress? {nm} Apr 04, 10:10
Again, Trump did not order the investigation of links between Russia and his campaign. {nm} Apr 04, 10:16
If there is no collusion, why would he order an investigation? {nm} Apr 04, 11:12
If there's collusion, then why would he order an investibation. {nm} Apr 04, 11:28
Your answering your own question. Either way, why would Trump ask for an investigation? That's someone elses job. {nm} Apr 04, 11:52
Russian meddling in the U.S. election is a huge national security issue that should concern the President. Apr 04, 12:07
Being concerned and doing someone elses job are two different things. Example...... Apr 04, 12:23
Trump is the "moderator" in your analogy. It IS his job to issue executive orders to direct government agencies. {nm} Apr 04, 12:40
Not suggesting that he can't direct, but that the FBI & Congress don't need permission to do their jobs. {nm} Apr 04, 12:48
Agree that both lie, and that an honest nice (person) is preferred. {nm} Apr 04, 11:18