TVStocks, MusicStocks and Life

Obama criticized by former staffers for not attacking Syria earlier TJNFL1 Apr 16, 14:46

Perhaps President Obama relied more on the Advice from the Generals at the Pentagon. {nm} Captain Obvious Apr 16, 17:52

Perhaps? TJNFL1 Apr 17, 19:14

but if he had, the attacks would have done more than create a bunch of potholes that failed to render the airbase or fighters useless {nm} slipping jimmy Apr 17, 00:45

Its a new form of diplomacy called, "action", that simply conveys a message through means other than just using words. {nm} TJNFL1 Apr 17, 19:18

The Syrian Civil War is over now. Every refugee can go home. Oh wait. The "action" accomplished nothing. Antibody Apr 17, 22:06

Sending a message is not the same thing as ending a war. {nm} TJNFL1 Apr 18, 10:41

If Trump sends the same message to North Korea, he's gonna start the Korean War 2. {nm} Antibody Apr 18, 11:02

There are some articles concerning China and the U.S. working together on North Korea listed down the page. {nm} TJNFL1 Apr 18, 11:05

Russia and US were working together on Syria, which you criticize for not taking "action". {nm} Antibody Apr 18, 11:09

The first time chemical weapons were used, nothing happened, the second time they were used, an airport was bombed. {nm} TJNFL1 Apr 18, 11:16

That's not true, US went the diplomatic route with Russia who had more influence on Assad to remove the chemical weapons. Antibody Apr 18, 11:25

Which were not, and were never going to be removed as there were no consequences under Obama. {nm} TJNFL1 Apr 18, 11:42

Syrian didn't use chemical weapons again under Obama, or there would have been consequences. Antibody Apr 18, 12:02

How could Syria use chemical weapons that it said it got rid of? {nm} TJNFL1 Apr 18, 12:19