HOLLYWOOD STOCK EXCHANGE
THE ENTERTAINMENT MARKET
THE ENTERTAINMENT MARKET
A word to the wise to all fund managers....
I am only pointing at TRUE because of all of the verbiage, but the point applies to all theme funds.
It should not be that hard to match StarBond holdings to DROI.
As an example, and only an exemple, TRUE is holding 5 StarBonds. 2 (EDRAM and MDUPL) have no release dates, and thus, no real dROI. HFORD (42) is .58 RCORD (PAING) is .29 MBAY (PAING) is .04 (and neither 42 nor PAING is radared among the MovieStocks, )
On the other hand, not held is GGBER-NO (1.44) and WHERZ-HPYIT (.46) are not held.
As I say, I am not picking on TRUE, and I never criticize brother fund managers. So this is meant as constructive criticism.
If you have a list of potential movies for your fund, try to keep track of which ones have release dates. Of those, try to have a list, somewhere, of the attached starbonds and try to invest in them based upon dROI (KaiGee can be sorted that way.) In my fund, I try to have a floor dROI which rises as I have more H$ to invest. But BONDS invests everything into StarBonds, so when the fund reaches 80M, I have to get down to dROI of .40. Right now, with about 40M to invest, I have .62 as my "worst"
A word to the wise to all fund managers.... Mar 27, 05:46
Well said. Though in truth, I'm not looking forward to analyzing BONDS that much. {nm} Mar 27, 05:48
That's an easy one. Find a list of starbonds by dROI. Check whether BONDS is holding them or not. Done. {nm} Mar 27, 07:41
Thanks the point. Not much analysis that isn't nit-picking small mistakes. {nm} Mar 27, 12:58
I also took a look at the successful LAFSF.... Mar 27, 06:17
not ALL fund managers . . . why would a studio fund manager care about bonds? [nm] Mar 28, 06:54
