Question, just because I'm curious at the moment. What's the rationale given for why studio funds don't allow starbonds? {nm} Dec 29, 20:48
Do studios "own" the stars? {nm} Dec 29, 22:02
No, but you could argue that while working on the films, they are contracted employees of the studios. {nm} Dec 30, 05:39
You have been here longer than me so you should know the answer.... Dec 30, 05:50
So does that mean I shouldn't hold actor/actress/director NominOptions for movies that WB released? {nm} Dec 30, 08:54
No that's ok to do, DMac's initial email to me explicitly says related derivatives are allowed to be traded. {nm} Dec 30, 09:38
Back when I was the first manager of MGMX and I had very few openers, I invested in all (both?) the related nominoptons. PCLAR actually Dec 30, 10:37
Wait, what? No, wait... No Lionsgate related nominoptions...Oh, ok... Nevermind... :) {nm} Dec 30, 14:15
Man, you got a short straw buddy, I do not envy you. :-) {nm} Dec 30, 18:47
It's ok, I'm making the best of it... Already reaching what the previous manager did, anything else is profit... :) {nm} Dec 31, 06:04
Same here, although the previous owner of my fund ended at $7.81, so I didn't have to do much to best it! {nm} Dec 31, 09:22
Well, there is Nick Nolte/Warrior {nm} Dec 30, 23:05
I hadn't noticed that! Thanks! :) {nm} Dec 31, 06:03