HOLLYWOOD STOCK EXCHANGE
THE ENTERTAINMENT MARKET
THE ENTERTAINMENT MARKET
Just because that's what funds are currently in HSX, doesn't mean that's how it should be.
Just like in real trading, there's good funds, and bad funds. It's all relative. A good fund is one that disciplined about what it holds, with respect to its stated goals. All those funds that overweight on AVNGR, would be well managed, if it's stated goals were stated as "Overweight on opening Mega Blockbusters". It would enable people to get in on the big openers without having the capital to buy the stock individually.
If you really want to be "All in" , There at least 2 Funds that ought to be renamed AVNGRFUND May 05, 23:27
correction... May 05, 23:31
There are 3 funds actually that went 100% Avengers {nm} May 06, 04:51
....and these are bad strategies? Object of the fund: to maximize profits. Do you have better ideas for short term gains? {nm} May 06, 06:10
Yes bad strategy for a fund. It's supposed to represent smaller risk than buying the equity directly. May 06, 06:15
Not in HSX. Funds are more about showing new traders how to play, and how different strategies work in action. May 06, 07:02
Just because that's what funds are currently in HSX, doesn't mean that's how it should be. May 06, 08:33
Not sure if anyone said it was a bad strategy, until elchan {nm} May 06, 07:04
It's because 'actually' can mean different things, depending on where it's placed in a sentence May 06, 07:27
Translation for RogerMore May 06, 07:30
Translation for Razorhawk May 06, 07:47
+1 for proper usage of both imply and infer. May 06, 07:57
is this correct? May 06, 08:04
You are correct, 100%. It is a pet peeve, like nails on a chalkboard. {nm} May 06, 08:35
J.L. Austin thanks you for your efforts. :) May 06, 08:10
AFRAM is invested in as much Avengers as it could afford. {nm} May 06, 05:26
As is DISNXFund (nm) May 06, 07:11
