HOLLYWOOD STOCK EXCHANGE
THE ENTERTAINMENT MARKET
THE ENTERTAINMENT MARKET
Then again, that number is really small expecially considering the 100K increase in holding movies, like maybe less than a hundred ports . {nm}
Is there a way to change rankings to something that eliminates port size from the equation? Apr 14, 13:04
Well stated. I had mentioned this when leagues were first made possible, but, it does hold for general comparisons. Apr 14, 16:57
I will sugest a table ranking concept but if you care for an easy purely math solution what you need is expresion like this Apr 15, 04:14
quick solution didn/t bother to test values . Apr 15, 04:42
quick solution didn/t bother to test values . Apr 15, 04:42
A = 1/log(X, 10) * C abs(Y) (1+Z) or A = 1/log(X, 10) * C Y (1+abs(Z)) Apr 15, 05:20
A = 1/log(X, 10) * C abs(Y) (1+Z) or A = 1/log(X, 10) * C Y (1+abs(Z)) Apr 15, 05:20
A = 1/log(X, 10) * C Y (1+abs(Z)) will work better. {nm} Apr 15, 09:03
I'm going to take your word on it. If I tried math I could probably crash the virtual HSX economy. LOL! {nm} Apr 16, 19:18
Look inside... {nm} Apr 17, 05:52
once more. Apr 17, 06:10
I was thinking something a lot simpler. For instance, let's say on my H$1.25 billion port... Apr 17, 19:56
I see. However.... Apr 17, 20:39
The other problem is that large ports can not be fully invested. Market limitations force Apr 18, 06:55
True...but that is compensate (offset) by the fact that they earn interest (crap interest but interest) in their cash part. Apr 18, 08:35
Interest doesn't even come close to an offset for sidelined money. Apr 18, 13:31
Then again, that number is really small expecially considering the 100K increase in holding movies, like maybe less than a hundred ports . Apr 18, 10:27