HOLLYWOOD STOCK EXCHANGE
THE ENTERTAINMENT MARKET
THE ENTERTAINMENT MARKET
Starbond market pricing incorporates the value of upcoming releases. Why change that when someone dies?
If anything, delisting at the current price at time of death is a better reflection of the TAG system. Why should an actor's value otentially change wildly depending on whether they die right before or right after a release? Isn't their contribution to the film just the same? The market price factors all that in. Changing the price to only released movies deviates more from the Starbond pricing model than just taking the last price IMO.
Let's discuss an imprecise time of death. If someone dies right around the time of a movie opening and exact time of death can't be determined (even though science can pin these things down fairly well) then how can you know whehter that movie should be included in the TAG or not? The decision on whether to factor in that last movie could very well significantly change the value of a Starbond. That would add even more uncertainty IMO.
If you are using the last price then that would be a less volatile change in value. The last price could be set as the midpoint time in the coroner range, average of the two endpoints, or even some other method. Regardless, those prices will all generally be more similar to each other than the two prices of including or excluding the actors last credited film.
'Star Trek' star Anton Yelchin dead. Jun 19, 11:30
That's sad. {nm} Jun 19, 11:44
True. He was very young. {nm} Jun 19, 11:48
i was REALLY hoping that was a hoax but no...2016 has claimed another great talent. Rest in Peace {nm} Jun 19, 12:46
I lost money on his tag. A lot of people will be upset. {nm} Jun 19, 13:28
Fake money means nothing in the context of a human life. {nm} Jun 19, 13:37
Even real money means nothing in context of human life. {nm} Jun 19, 13:43
Tell that to the arms manufacturers. {nm} Jun 19, 13:54
Get down from your bloody cross already. {nm} Jun 19, 16:18
Blessed are the peacemakers :D {nm} Jun 19, 17:05
For they shall Inherit the Earth. Jun 19, 17:56
They will inherit the Earth right after the rest of us leave to conquer the stars!!! {nm} Jun 20, 12:47
+1 {nm} Jun 19, 14:01
Priorities man. {nm} Jun 19, 13:51
Shame on you, creepy person {nm} Jun 19, 14:13
Disgusting troll gonna troll. Disgustingly. {nm} Jun 19, 15:20
I hope you choke on that fake money you lost... troll. {nm} Jun 19, 15:25
how are you not banned for life yet? {nm} Jun 19, 17:02
I remember from the Taken miniseries. He had a remarkable career despite his young age. {nm} Jun 19, 19:58
Rough way to go too if you read about how it happened. This past week has been rough with deaths. {nm} Jun 19, 14:58
The Sh*tty Part of the Game - Read about S/B's Death - Get Confirmation - Go to S/B Page - Make Adjustments. Jun 19, 17:14
There were 942,203 Shares Traded before Halt. Jun 19, 17:26
You can chose out of respect not to play that part of the game and take the small loss {nm} Jun 19, 19:52
You can Choose to Play the HSX Game however you want. Got Nothing to do with Respect / Disrespect. Jun 19, 20:22
Your Call - Play however you Want. 942,203 Shares Traded. No Disrespect Shown there. Jun 19, 20:47
This Website should really Bend-You-Out-Of-Shape. Jun 19, 20:47
Would it work to delist the Starbond at the price that it was at corresponding to their time of death? Jun 19, 23:30
Yes, I understand how it currently works. I'm asking if just delisting at price of time of death wouldn't be better. Jun 19, 23:59
+1 {nm} Jun 19, 23:47
You are Wrong - the Delist Price would be EXACTLY the same (1.08) even if there were no Trades. {nm} Jun 20, 00:14
I'm asking why the delist price shouldn't just be the market price at best known time of death instead? Jun 20, 00:29
What 'Problem' do you think Exists? do you think the Current Rules are UNFAIR? If so, why? {nm} Jun 20, 00:36
I think delisting at the coroner's estimated time of death would be the fairest price. Jun 20, 00:52
Keep Hearing the Word 'R-E-S-P-E-C-T'. Stop using it - it's got Nothing to do with this. What's UNFAIR? {nm} Jun 20, 01:03
Why does something need to be "unfair" for an alternative to be considered which could be even more fair? Jun 20, 01:19
Keep Hearing the Word 'F-A-I-R'. How is your Proposal 'More Fair'? To Whom? Just Adds Confusion & Uncertainty. {nm} Jun 20, 05:52
Delisting at the price at time of death is confusing? I don't know what could be easier. Jun 20, 07:49
Delisting at price at time of death would also address the case of someone dying after OW while the stock is still active. Jun 20, 01:31
HSX StarBonds are based on the TAG System. You are proposing a non-TAG-based Deviation. Adds Uncertainty. Jun 20, 05:46
Starbond market pricing incorporates the value of upcoming releases. Why change that when someone dies? Jun 20, 08:22
What you are Proposing is Unworkable - it would Require HSX to Adjust ALL Trades made Before Halt. Jun 20, 06:06
The ONLY Thing your Proposal Accomplishes is to Reduce the Profits of those that made Trades before Halt. {nm} Jun 20, 06:59
And to Minimize the Losses of Those that Didn't. Smacks of Self-Interest. {nm} Jun 20, 07:00
You are Wrong - any Trades have Zero (0) Effect on the eventual Delist Price. {nm} Jun 20, 00:15
How would anyone know the EXACT Price at the EXACT Time of Death? {nm} Jun 20, 00:15
What if Authorities could not Determine the EXACT Time of Death (e.g.- Prince)? Or take Weeks to Answer? {nm} Jun 20, 00:17
Millions Benefit every Day from Someone's Death - Most are called 'Beneficiaries'. Some 'Enemy Combatants'. {nm} Jun 20, 00:18
What horrible news. {nm} Jun 20, 03:55
Very sad news - RIP {nm} Jun 20, 06:36
So sad, I loved him in the trek movies. Great successor to mr. Koenig. {nm} Jun 20, 09:46
I've been reading up on his family. They've been through way too much. {nm} Jun 20, 19:16