HOLLYWOOD STOCK EXCHANGE
THE ENTERTAINMENT MARKET
THE ENTERTAINMENT MARKET
The "But" is there because it's not ALL public areas (that you are insisting), but SOME public places. You're the one ignoring the facts {nm}
Quebec passes law banning facial coverings in public Oct 18, 21:21
How is a ban on "public transit" not a ban "in public"? {nm} Oct 19, 09:44
Because you can still wlk down the street wearing a niqab or burqa. {nm} Oct 19, 10:27
You can walk/drive/bike anywhere, shop, eat at restaurants, work in the private sector... need I really go on?? {nm} Oct 19, 13:32
Heck, you can even attend a sporting event, and kneel during the anthem if you want. {nm} Oct 19, 13:33
Apparently in Quebec you can't take public transportation to the sporting event with a facial covering. {nm} Oct 19, 23:32
But you can still go to it, which is why your initial point was blatantly wrong. {nm} Oct 20, 07:29
Beginning your statement with "But" only points to the truth you are trying to ignore. {nm} Oct 22, 01:43
The "But" is there because it's not ALL public areas (that you are insisting), but SOME public places. You're the one ignoring the facts Oct 22, 11:28
Who said anything about "ALL" public areas? {nm} Oct 23, 01:33
You did. Above post - -How is a ban on "public transit" not a ban "in public"? -- {nm} Oct 23, 16:47
To be clear: the 'but' in this case was pointing out the MASSIVE flaw in your argument, which made it false. {nm} Oct 22, 13:31
What is the massive flaw? Being on public transit is being in public. {nm} Oct 23, 01:35
