HSX Forum

Movies

I don't how wanting equality and fairness is "having it out for white people". {nm}

Posted by: Antibody on Mar 31, 12:09 in response to adrenalin112's post geez you really have it out for white people dmac

C: Ghost in the Shell Is Racist in Unexpected Ways (would make an interesting double feature with Get Out) Antibody Mar 31, 08:32

which apparently is one reason WB is chasing Peele for Akira. or they could just cast the roles appropriately {nm} slipping jimmy Mar 31, 09:07

They did. They put a good looking girl in a role she deserves {nm} tteddy286 Mar 31, 12:52

you think we're taking this racism thing too far... durf Mar 31, 09:34

The article had a pretty simple explanation. From my POV the twisting comes from the "this couldn't possibly be racist in any way" argument {nm} RogerMore Mar 31, 09:47

we aren't anywhere remotely in the vicinity of "far" in dealing with white America's racism {nm} slipping jimmy Mar 31, 09:56

There's no "contorting" to see what's plain in sight. A Tokyo where Japanese people is a minority. A Japanese woman LITERALLY Antibody Mar 31, 09:58

why is ok to cast a minority in the role of a traditionally white character, but not ok to cast a white person as a traditionally ethnic adrenalin112 Mar 31, 10:59

name one example of the negative that you're saying exists (white actor taking a traditionally non-white role) {nm} slipping jimmy Mar 31, 11:02

liz banks in power rangers {nm} adrenalin112 Mar 31, 11:03

isnt Ghost in the shell another example? Scarlett playing Major Motoko Kusanagi, I dont know Manga stuff??? {nm} adrenalin112 Mar 31, 11:06

miles teller playing latin vinny pazienza (bleed for this) {nm} adrenalin112 Mar 31, 11:11

these are not on the same level as Barbie or Spiderman, sorry {nm} slipping jimmy Mar 31, 11:15

well we havent switched up barbie or spiderman yet.... so whats your point {nm} adrenalin112 Mar 31, 11:22

They did in the comics. Even did it to Ironman {nm} tteddy286 Mar 31, 12:54

I think you have to look case by case. In this specific case, it's the lead role, and also most of the other roles in the movie. RogerMore Mar 31, 11:10

Because white people have been taking the roles of underrepresented minorities hundred of years, but not vice versa. {nm} Antibody Mar 31, 11:30

so now its time to exact revenge & exclude white people? {nm} adrenalin112 Mar 31, 11:41

No, casting POC to play roles created as POC would just be a start. That's not exclusion. {nm} Antibody Mar 31, 11:47

Casting a POC to play a fictional white character would then be just leveling the acting field. {nm} Antibody Mar 31, 11:51

im upset that british emma watson was cast to play a french belle, i must protest my disgust! {nm} adrenalin112 Mar 31, 12:01

geez you really have it out for white people dmac {nm} adrenalin112 Mar 31, 12:04

I don't how wanting equality and fairness is "having it out for white people". Antibody Mar 31, 12:09

Because you want to exclude white people from being able to play characters that were traditionally a POC adrenalin112 Mar 31, 12:15

Nope, I never said white people should be excluded and those roles can only be played by POC. {nm} Antibody Mar 31, 12:19

Wanting POC to play roles written for POC is not coming at the expense of white people. {nm} Antibody Mar 31, 12:22

And how is that not? {nm} tteddy286 Mar 31, 12:47

Though again, we still have Peter Parker and white Barbie. They're not excluded. {nm} RogerMore Mar 31, 11:47

Racism would be casting based on race, not on what will generate the most profit... durf Mar 31, 10:17

This post proves my point. {nm} RogerMore Mar 31, 10:28

if anything it proves you're racist {nm} durf Mar 31, 10:32

don't mean to make it a personal attack on you . . . just the fact this is being discussed means those who bring it up are racist. {nm} durf Mar 31, 10:34

they need to look deep inside...they have a lot of hate, sad. {nm} durf Mar 31, 10:35

No, it just proves you should be asking yourself some obvious questions. RogerMore Mar 31, 10:41

Actually had this movie been cast with a more traditional look & its appropriate asian race, it could have been more profitable. {nm} adrenalin112 Mar 31, 11:01

Though there's a twist there as well - would a Hollywood studio be able to make an Asian-themed movie for Asians that is profitable? RogerMore Mar 31, 11:46

Fresh of the boat is seeming to do really well, its one of my favorite sitcoms on tv at the moment. adrenalin112 Mar 31, 12:11

Though TV is something that allows a lot more experimentation and risk-taking. The show's not working quite well? Tweak it. The show doesn't RogerMore Mar 31, 12:38

To answer the question, yes, but it has to be done in baby steps, and building up stars to appropriately represent the culture & appeal to adrenalin112 Mar 31, 12:13

But paraphrasing, that's "yes, but not yet" {nm} RogerMore Mar 31, 12:25

What's disgusting is how much stupid is out there, especially amongst white people. islander Mar 31, 10:35

that white guilt runs deep {nm} adrenalin112 Mar 31, 11:02

No that's not it. {nm} islander Mar 31, 11:06

thats just 1 of many reasons. Another of which is, they just dont understand the perspective of something theyve never experienced {nm} adrenalin112 Mar 31, 11:13

Exactly - many people don't like what they don't know. When I was a kid, I rarely saw non-white and never interacted with them, then as an JDolphin Mar 31, 12:34

this isn't about people's own personal experiences. this is about persistent discrimination on a systemic level {nm} slipping jimmy Mar 31, 12:38

But people are discriminated for all sorts of reasons - there is persitant against - short, fat, old, female, etc. Just because you haven't JDolphin Mar 31, 14:11

nobody has to feel guilty about remedying past discrimination. just do it and be happy {nm} slipping jimmy Mar 31, 11:50

No one has to remedy anything. Dont blame the current generation for prior generations mistakes. {nm} adrenalin112 Mar 31, 12:17

fixing the past in no way assigns "blame" or "guilt" (except in the mind of white people, apparently). it's just fixing what's been broken {nm} slipping jimmy Mar 31, 12:23

Get em man. Hit them all with the truth. They all seem to have a great disregard for fairness by desiring only POC in roles {nm} tteddy286 Mar 31, 12:50

Dude, hit the nail right on the head. {nm} tteddy286 Mar 31, 12:57

It is absolutely AMAZING that Rollingthunder hasn't said a damn thing about this. {nm} PlayItAgainSam Mar 31, 18:52

Was this movie making a political comment that I missed? Is it a real life story? Maybe it is making a comment about 98.5% Japanese Japan? Catzan Mar 31, 22:13





Post a Reply

To post to the forums you must first login!


Elio (ELIO) 25555 115.01 (-1.76)          NBC: Extended Family (EXTFAM) 25000 13.02 (-0.21)          Poolman (POOLM) 149999 1.52 (0.00)          Hannah Waddingham (HWADD) 25000 74.62 (-0.50)          Friday Night Lights (FRIN2) 30000 2.07 (0.00)          Summer Camp (SUMCP) 1 8.53 (-0.07)          Summer Camp (SUMCP) 150000 8.53 (-0.07)          Don't Tell Mom the Babysitter's (DTMBD) 30000 1.13 (+0.02)          Untitled Alejandro Gonzalez Inar (UAGIP) 10000 60.97 (+0.97)          Lips Like Sugar (LIPLS) 25000 11.55 (+0.21)          Lips Like Sugar (LIPLS) 1 11.55 (+0.21)          Nobody 2 (NOBO2) 1 17.16 (+1.27)          Nobody 2 (NOBO2) 150000 17.16 (+1.27)          Phil Lord (PLORD) 25000 153.02 (+0.50)          Don't Tell Mom the Babysitter's (DTMBD) 30000 1.13 (+0.02)          Dark Army (DARKA) 30000 7.30 (-0.03)          Dark Army (DARKA) 30000 7.30 (-0.03)          Cupid (CUPID) 30000 1.25 (-0.03)          Cupid (CUPID) 30000 1.25 (-0.03)          Night of the Living Dead (NOTLD) 50000 9.69 (0.00)          Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga (MMAX5) 184 155.45 (-0.27)          Night of the Living Dead (NOTLD) 50000 9.69 (0.00)          Night of the Living Dead (NOTLD) 50000 9.69 (0.00)          Night of the Living Dead (NOTLD) 50000 9.69 (0.00)          Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga (MMAX5) 14 155.45 (-0.27)          Night of the Living Dead (NOTLD) 50000 9.69 (0.00)          Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga (MMAX5) 14 155.45 (-0.27)          Night of the Living Dead (NOTLD) 50000 9.69 (0.00)          Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga (MMAX5) 14 155.45 (-0.27)          Coup de Chance (CDCHN) 10000 0.42 (0.00)          That Christmas (THCHR) 149999 1.59 (0.00)          Anora (ANORA) 50000 4.10 (+0.49)          Anora (ANORA) 50000 4.10 (+0.49)          Anora (ANORA) 50000 4.10 (+0.49)          Barney (BRNEY) 150000 12.80 (-0.02)          Anora (ANORA) 50000 4.10 (+0.49)          Anora (ANORA) 50000 4.10 (+0.49)          Anora (ANORA) 50000 4.10 (+0.49)          Touch (TOUC) 50000 0.66 (+0.02)          Touch (TOUC) 50000 0.66 (+0.02)          Touch (TOUC) 50000 0.66 (+0.02)          Touch (TOUC) 50000 0.66 (+0.02)          Touch (TOUC) 50000 0.66 (+0.02)          Touch (TOUC) 50000 0.66 (+0.02)          Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga (MMAX5) 148774 155.45 (-0.27)          Fackham Hall (FACKH) 150000 7.06 (-0.07)          Kent State (KENTS) 1 5.42 (+0.26)          Flowervale Street (FLWVS) 149999 42.21 (0.00)          Jumanji sequel (JUMN3) 150000 72.01 (-0.58)          Shang-Chi 2 (SHCH2) 150000 80.51 (-0.41)