HSX really needs to go back to the old IPO system where stocks halt until reset. Mar 03, 04:58
And HSX still hasn't addressed the issue that one person buying/shorting/selling a stock can affect the price. Mar 03, 05:00
That was the whole reason for the change. We want price movements to be more granular. Mar 03, 10:08
Also, another IPO has 11 to 1 shorts than longs and that goes down just .39 at reset? That makes sense. {nm} Mar 03, 05:45
Repeat, trading affects price movement, not shares held. {nm} Mar 03, 10:09
Here is where we do not understand what we thought we knew in the past.... Mar 03, 13:18
Your assumption is/was wrong. :) Mar 03, 17:09
So why create the Cantor Exchange, where stock prices actually are affected by people selling/buying... Mar 04, 03:00
CX was going to be the real money. As I explain below, this is how IPO and trading in the real world works. Mar 04, 09:31
You just don't get my point. Mar 07, 06:51
I just don't understand why shares shorted/sold aren't considered in the limited IPO and only shares bought. Mar 07, 11:00
That's also how shorts in the real stock market work. They are merely "borrowed" shares. {nm} Mar 07, 14:30
Remember when the changes were made..."we'll be watching the boards, so post your thoughts" Mar 03, 06:46
The trading mechanism would be exactly the same. You just didn't notice it before when the shares held were not revealed. {nm} Mar 03, 10:15
Interesting... {nm} Mar 03, 17:52
Your best comment on the situation Mar 03, 11:48
what the reset traders do is usually balanced out by reasoned trading later in the day anyhow {nm} Mar 03, 15:00
Yes, instead of ****ing, we need to look at them as opportunities, especially if there is no reason for the moves! {nm} Mar 04, 08:15