HSX Forums: CelebStock and Stars Board
What happens if there are no future attachments...IF and WHEN there is a future adjust????
AFERR will lose HGGSS which did .09 no matter what project replaces it.
ALAPA will lose WSOLS which did .32 long term cannot get worse.
DWENH will lose MARIG which did 1,51.
JLCUR loses HLWN8 which did 30.18 so this could go either way.
KCHEN loses STFIC which did 40.14 so this could go either way,
LBLAC loses FRINL which did 61.19 so this could go either way, but needs a solid hit to go up.
SSPCK will drop AMHAU which did 16.30 so this could go either way.
Note on MLEO....RH has the adjust of Dec 3 for CONVC correct. Advised both the-numbers and PrG to fix FITER which adjusts one week later tnan CONVC.
Note on HWEAV....side bet....which will do more....CAPAM or HPYFT (197.99) doh
Post Adjust Bond Show For 10/19/10 on Oct 19, 11:32
thx again for crunching the numbers {nm} on Oct 19, 11:48
What happens if there are no future attachments...IF and WHEN there is a future adjust???? on Oct 19, 12:16
Thanks for this although a couple of changes... on Oct 19, 12:23
Sorry that post should have been below the OP {nm} on Oct 19, 12:23
It's not worth holding if they don't have a future adjust. {nm} on Oct 19, 12:42
I disagree with that statement, and I think many other large portfolio players would agree. on Oct 19, 14:11
Congratulations and thanks to mrbinns btw for the star bond fund, cashing out v soon! {nm} on Oct 19, 14:36
There's no ROI if there's no future attachment. on Oct 19, 14:56
I disagree with you... on Oct 19, 15:00
This piqued my interest, and I did a little test to see whether bonds are dropping a big movie from their TAG fall in value on Oct 20, 08:38
Your conclusion could be true for all StarBond w/o scheduled adjust. Traders could be just dumping those StarBonds and moving on. {nm} on Oct 20, 09:58
If that were true though, you'd expect the Starbonds that have a scheduled adjust to fall in price by more than the ones without one. on Oct 20, 13:23
Probably, I thought you were gonna show that inside your message. on Oct 20, 14:02
I showed it in my first message - bonds dropping a big movie that have an adjust are on average $20.86 below current TAG. on Oct 20, 14:17
Then isn't the conclusion is that price drop because there is a next adjust, rather than what's falling out of the adjust? {nm} on Oct 20, 14:53
Bonds with a scheduled adjust have dropped $20.86 (on average) Bonds with no scheduled adjust but something wrapped/in production have on Oct 20, 15:26
RH does note Bonds with something wrapped/in production, so those should be grouped with Bonds with a scheduled adjust. on Oct 20, 15:58
I see another issue of contention - "is RH correct when he says mrbinns is over-investing?". That's the one I'm looking at. {nm} on Oct 20, 16:22
If nothing else, wish me happy anniversary.....today is exactly 10 years hanging out at HSX on Oct 21, 11:38
Happy anniversary! {nm} on Oct 21, 19:31
interesting... on Oct 20, 10:40
I'm not arguing with you either, just providing information on a topic that intrigued me. But... on Oct 20, 13:54
When I have extra cash, (normally have cash problems) I do invest in starbonds with no scheduled adjust when a big movie is to be taken out. {nm} on Oct 20, 12:37
Part of the fun of post-adjust (before the existence of the Post Adjust Bond Show at least)... on Oct 19, 17:31
Sure, but mrbinns is saying to hold it indefinitely for an adjust that may never come. {nm} on Oct 20, 11:09
If its by the message he replied to you....I did not read "hold it indefinately for all cases". He suggested that sometimes is worthy. on Oct 20, 12:33
Oh, I wouldn't do that... even with the ridiculous amounts of fake cash I have lying around. {nm} on Oct 20, 18:02