HSX Forums: CelebStock and Stars Board
Probably, I thought you were gonna show that inside your message.
You already show that StarBonds with a wrapped film (and thus a probable future adjust) dropped more than the StarBonds without any future adjust.
Bonds losing a big movie from TAG and with a wrapped/in production project - trading on average $22.13 below TAG.
Bonds losing a big movie from TAG and without a project wrapped or in production: trading on average $20.19 below TAG.
I'm all for traders to speculate on their own. I have a problem when someone makes leading statement on something completely speculative.
Post Adjust Bond Show For 10/19/10 on Oct 19, 11:32
thx again for crunching the numbers {nm} on Oct 19, 11:48
What happens if there are no future attachments...IF and WHEN there is a future adjust???? on Oct 19, 12:16
Thanks for this although a couple of changes... on Oct 19, 12:23
Sorry that post should have been below the OP {nm} on Oct 19, 12:23
It's not worth holding if they don't have a future adjust. {nm} on Oct 19, 12:42
I disagree with that statement, and I think many other large portfolio players would agree. on Oct 19, 14:11
Congratulations and thanks to mrbinns btw for the star bond fund, cashing out v soon! {nm} on Oct 19, 14:36
There's no ROI if there's no future attachment. on Oct 19, 14:56
I disagree with you... on Oct 19, 15:00
This piqued my interest, and I did a little test to see whether bonds are dropping a big movie from their TAG fall in value on Oct 20, 08:38
Your conclusion could be true for all StarBond w/o scheduled adjust. Traders could be just dumping those StarBonds and moving on. {nm} on Oct 20, 09:58
If that were true though, you'd expect the Starbonds that have a scheduled adjust to fall in price by more than the ones without one. on Oct 20, 13:23
Probably, I thought you were gonna show that inside your message. on Oct 20, 14:02
I showed it in my first message - bonds dropping a big movie that have an adjust are on average $20.86 below current TAG. on Oct 20, 14:17
Then isn't the conclusion is that price drop because there is a next adjust, rather than what's falling out of the adjust? {nm} on Oct 20, 14:53
Bonds with a scheduled adjust have dropped $20.86 (on average) Bonds with no scheduled adjust but something wrapped/in production have on Oct 20, 15:26
RH does note Bonds with something wrapped/in production, so those should be grouped with Bonds with a scheduled adjust. on Oct 20, 15:58
I see another issue of contention - "is RH correct when he says mrbinns is over-investing?". That's the one I'm looking at. {nm} on Oct 20, 16:22
If nothing else, wish me happy anniversary.....today is exactly 10 years hanging out at HSX on Oct 21, 11:38
Happy anniversary! {nm} on Oct 21, 19:31
interesting... on Oct 20, 10:40
I'm not arguing with you either, just providing information on a topic that intrigued me. But... on Oct 20, 13:54
When I have extra cash, (normally have cash problems) I do invest in starbonds with no scheduled adjust when a big movie is to be taken out. {nm} on Oct 20, 12:37
Part of the fun of post-adjust (before the existence of the Post Adjust Bond Show at least)... on Oct 19, 17:31
Sure, but mrbinns is saying to hold it indefinitely for an adjust that may never come. {nm} on Oct 20, 11:09
If its by the message he replied to you....I did not read "hold it indefinately for all cases". He suggested that sometimes is worthy. on Oct 20, 12:33
Oh, I wouldn't do that... even with the ridiculous amounts of fake cash I have lying around. {nm} on Oct 20, 18:02